Kerr Neilson’s 7 top tips for navigating today’s market
They say the best advantage an investor can have is time. However, without knowledge and experience, investors are unlikely to be successful - no matter how much time they have on their hands.
This can only be built by taking risks, making mistakes and being humble enough to learn from them - something Kerr Neilson knows well, given he's been investing for more than two of my lifetimes.
In today's market, we need more guidance than ever. There are geopolitical tensions aplenty, recessionary storm clouds brewing, and cash costs a whole lot more than it did two years ago - meaning the proverbial strings are now tightening on both consumer and corporate wallets.
So, in this wire, I summarise seven of Neilson's top tips for navigating today's market, taken from Livewire's recent interview with Platinum Asset Management's co-founder and former CEO.
This includes why he's limiting exposure to China, the repercussions of central bank actions from the last few years, why he believes investors may be better off investing for themselves, as well as the areas of opportunity (and a few stock ideas) that he has identified today.
Note: The quotes in the article below are taken from an interview recorded on Thursday 12 October 2023.
1. Governments don't create wealth, businesses do
"I started investing at 13 and I didn't have a clue. I think I didn't have a clue for the first 15 years of being in the markets. Then I started to understand," he said.
"You need to understand what I now call the 'engine room' - what really gives a company the ability to earn a spread, what right it has to earn a spread, what determines how large that spread is and on what base of assets that spread is earned."
As Neilson explains, some businesses need very few assets, so the "engine room" is not easily definable.
"Then you can start worrying about growth," he said.
"There's an obsession about growth, which is good, but it's not the whole story. If you just have a very nice free cash flow through time, that's worth a lot."
2. The risks are only increasing in China
Neilson has long invested in Asia, having established the Platinum Asia Fund back in 2003. And while he still is "interested" in the rest of Asia, he's capped his exposure to China at 10%.
"The real issue is in China - the property market is hugely oversupplied," he said.
"The exposure of various financial institutions to properties is greater than they declare - they mask what they truly have in terms of exposure. So I think this is quite a long workout."
Neilson points the finger at Xi Jinping, dubbing China's paramount leader as "impatient".
"He tried his social control game with COVID and oppressive lockdowns, which destroyed [the economy]. Then he's been more agro than he needs to have been on all fronts, so that hasn't helped with job creation," he said.
"So you've got high unemployment among educated youth over 20%, and now you're shutting down any communication in terms of collection of stats and the collection of market intelligence."
Neilson also believes the risks for Taiwan haven't diminished. In fact, "they've probably gone higher", he said.
"I'm much more interested in the rest of Asia, even though the deeper value is in China," Neilson said.
"You've got to balance all these things up. It's not just about return, it's how much variance is in the likely outcome of a return."
3. Central banks blew it when they made money free (and now we are in a bear market)
When I last spoke with Neilson in 2021, he argued that changing tax regimes should stoke fear in investors, not inflation.
"You're already seeing tax being a big issue," he said.
"They've now introduced differential tax to the banks in different countries in Europe, and I think a lot of the assumptions being made around packaged goods companies and all these others that they can raise prices with impunity, I think they'll find themselves having a differentiated tax rate."
And while today he admits that inflation isn't going to go away anytime soon, he does believe it can return to a lower level.
"I think we've got huge problems with the supply of labour, we've got high costs of materials and they're not coming down," Neilson said.
"So, I think we will get inflation to lower levels, but the idea that we get to anything like these central bank levels of 2% is a dream world."
"I think we need to set up parameters for a more difficult environment than we're familiar with because we really did blow it when we made money free," Neilson said.
Near 0% interest rates created "confusion" about the pricing of assets, and while some parts of the US market have repriced significantly, Neilson believes much of the pain has been masked by the Magnificent Seven
"We just had 35 years of falling rates. Now we've got a fairly prolonged period of rising rates and that means you have to reprice assets," he said.
"Remember, we've all been boiled in this cauldron and gradually the temperature's risen and we think it's all well... So it starts changing and eroding your confidence in making objective assessments."
So what is the objective assessment?
"The cost of money has risen and we don't fully understand this interaction between central banks and government spending and that's given a mad fillip to activity in the last few years, which is not going to persist," Neilson said.
In recent weeks, post-Livewire's interview with Neilson, the falls in markets have steepened, with major bourses like the NASDAQ 100, S&P 500 and ASX 200 down between 3.5-6.5%. He had this to add:
"Many markets are seeing breakdowns in crosses of their 50 and 200-day moving averages, indicating further pain," Neilson said.
"Rather than forecasting, I suggest investors watch the path of the US$ (and the BoJ meeting today and tomorrow). When the US$ turns down, and it looks very overbought, the turbulence in currency markets could set gold free (upwards)."
4. There's opportunity today in resources, biotech and AI
Neilson believes the opportunity today lies in resources, biotech and artificial intelligence - but keeping to brand, he recommends investors steer clear of crowded "fashionable" companies when investing in these sectors.
"Remember, all the time there are fashionable companies and unfashionable companies," he said.
"We've got Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) on 34 times sales, so that's clearly fashionable, but there are a lot of stocks at 30% of sales... There's always something that you can buy."
CapEx in metals and minerals, for instance, was running at $170 billion at the peak in 2014. It's been averaging around $62 billion for the last eight years.
"That's really quite low - and the grades keep falling and you know that finding resources is more difficult," he said.
Neilson currently likes copper and gold, noting the falloff in prices for the latter is "significant" and could pay dividends at some stage.
Meanwhile, he believes that investors can find companies that "grow naturally" in biotech.
"I think this is a rather remote idea, but if you look at AI, the facilitation it brings in terms of discovery and scientific advancement is huge and I think you'll see that in biotechs," he said.
"With that, the tool companies that provide all the lab and production equipment could have quite reasonable growth at a reasonable valuation. So it's those types of things we are looking at as potential hiding places in a difficult world."
"The trouble is there's such a desire by scientists to evolve these models and there's such a capitalist drive behind the profiteering that goes with it that I think it will be well entrenched, so much so that, at some stage, there'll be questions about culpability," he said.
"In the meantime, the way we're investing in it is the easy stocks like Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL) - I think Google's extremely well supported here... And then Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN). I don't own Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL)."
Neilson argued that AI has extended these mega-caps' market dominance by another 10 years.
"My theory is that most companies have a life of about 20 years and it's been shortening. So you need to think about that with your heroes," he said.
5. There are too many funds today
"Why it worked was there was total integrity of intent... The trouble is in today's world, there's so much product being issued and it's really just trying to put a bucket under every drop," he said.
"There's a falling integrity of intent, in my view, which is not healthy. There are too many funds. I mean, there are more funds than companies."
So, should investors manage their own money or pay one of the many managers out there to do it for them?
"To do it yourself is quite doable, for sure, but it does require time and that's the only difference. If you've got the time, I think you should do that," Neilson said.
6. 60 stocks make the perfect portfolio (and these are Kerr's top holdings)
While I may not have the time to track 60 stocks in my portfolio, Neilson believes that number is the sweet spot.
"It's hard to follow, but remember, your new stocks are probably 10 to 15. Your nice performers are another 15 to 20, and then you're getting companies that are starting to fade. So I think 60 is fine," he said.
"I run a little more because I've got a big tail of rubbish that I like to have. As Keating once said to me, 'You've got to have a few little runners'."
"It's a spread of different types of industries. It's not just sticking to AI. I don't invest that way," Neilson said.
"I still own some gold shares, which have made me no money at all for the last few years, but that's how I invest. I don't have a massively concentrated portfolio."
Neilson believes in topping up positions that are "hibernating" in his portfolio when winning stocks have seen these positions become "insignificant".
"Sizing is your problem running money because the idea that was prevalent was you just have very few stocks and you put big bets [on them]," he said.
"The trouble is it can make you myopic about the company and everything gets couched in the same terms - it's a nail, we better hammer it. So I think there's real benefit in having more spread."
7. Equities are still in vogue (but avoid fashionable stocks)
Neilson dubbed equities "the wealth creation, engine room of every society". Without them, societies are "dysfunctional", he argued.
"I see everything coming back to the corporate sector. So if anything's going to happen, the government will protect corporates who are creating jobs more than they'll protect bondholders, who they'll squeeze mercilessly with financial repression," he said.
Those with limited wealth should focus on owning their own homes - the next step in creating wealth is investing in equities - not bonds, in Neilson's view.
"The 60:40 rule has come under question. It may reestablish itself as we reprice everything, but for the moment, I'm still happy to own equities," he said.
"But again, I don't want to just buy the leaders. I want to buy the opportunity, those that are out of fashion because fashion is a problem of our lives. We joyfully follow the leader and then miss the laggards."
In case you missed the interview, you can check it out here:
Timecodes:
- 0:00 - Intro
- 0:47 - What kickstarted Kerr's investing journey
- 1:57 - The biggest wins and losses from his decades in markets
- 3:06 - How Kerr's approach to investing has changed since retirement
- 3:38 - The outlook for Asian equities (particularly China)
- 5:14 - The stocks Kerr owns in China: Baidu Inc (HKG: 9888), Tencent Holdings (HKG: 0700), ANTA Sports Products (HKG: 2020)
- 5:54 - Inflation and taxation regime changes
- 7:13 - We are facing a far more difficult environment than we have before
- 9:15 - Where are we in the cycle
- 10:22 - Where Kerr sees value today
- 12:00 - Kerr's stance on AI: "It's potentially dangerous"
- 14:59 - The biggest contributor to Kerr's wealth
- 16:50 - Kerr's biggest portfolio holdings today: Samsung Electronics Co (KRX: 005930), Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), Booking Holdings Inc (NASDAQ: BKNG), Compagnie de Saint Gobain SA (EPA: SGO).
- 18:54 - The perfect number of stocks for a portfolio
- 19:41 - The one asset class every Australian should own
4 topics
6 stocks mentioned
1 contributor mentioned