Ozempic comes for the ERP
There are a lot of different ways to calculate equity risk premia (ERP). Our graph below looks at a few of these.
You can take a measure like the S&P 500 forecast earnings yield, and subtract the risk-free rate, say, the US 10yr treasury bond rate. You can go a step better by using real risk-free rates, using either TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) or using a measure of expected inflation from the SPF (Survey of Professional Forecasters).
You can attempt to calculate the equity risk premia by wedging a proxy for the long-run rate of real earnings growth, to get a more complete measure (e.g. an ERP with growth estimates included, wg, or excluding it, xg).
And, in our view, you can normalise for the business cycle, by using a Shiller CAPE earnings yield (Cyclically Adjusted Price-Earnings ratio).
That's how the graph below comes together. What does it tell us?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a078/8a0789dc6a8aa0554efc390be4b98df59ec22188" alt=""
Well, we can note that ERP's got very skinny in 1999, just prior to the tech wreck. We can note it averaged a little over 5% in the years after the huge market sell-off, and that as a "line in the sand" it's been a reasonably useful guide to over or undervaluation.
However, on current numbers, however, you choose to dice it, that ERP is not very large. There is a degree of increasing euphoria, as the market believes that good growth continues, AI benefits a handful of listed firms, unemployment stays low and inflation recedes.
That may all well still happen, but, are you fairly compensated for the risk it doesn't?
That's a question investors need to be asking themselves.
1 topic