The low volatility phenomenon (and what it means for your portfolios)
Taking a punt on the market's fastest-growing, but most volatile stocks can pay off, right? After all, high risk could mean higher returns.
Interestingly, and perhaps counterintuitively, that actually isn't the case - at least, according to behavioural finance theory. In fact, the low volatility phenomenon has found that stocks displaying lower volatility go on to achieve higher returns than their more volatile counterparts.
This is because they typically fall less in down markets - meaning over the long term, they tend to generate higher risk-adjusted returns.
In this episode of The Pitch, State Street Global Advisors' Bruce Apted provides a thorough explanation of the low volatility phenomenon, outlines the types of businesses that fit into this "boring but beautiful" category, and shares what would need to happen for the market's current preference for high volatility stocks to reverse.
Note: This video was recorded on Wednesday 10 April 2024. You can watch the video or read an edited transcript below.
Edited Transcript
What is the low-volatility phenomenon?
Are there any anecdotes that you think can better illustrate that?
And if you actually look at it from an expected value point of view, you find that you actually have a negative expected value. So all of us who go and buy lottery tickets are essentially throwing away money. But it's a phenomenon that continues to persist, and there are businesses that have been built around that. And so it's an irrational behaviour that we see, and that is partly manifested in why people are interested in these high-volatility stocks with these potentially high payoffs versus stocks that are boring and dull and just consistent return-generating stocks.
We've seen growth stocks outperform in recent times. What would a catalyst be for that to reverse?
What kinds of businesses would fit into that boring but beautiful category?
I think the other obvious one that everyone can relate to is staples. We all buy food and we buy our alcohol and different things like that. So those things are purchased regardless of the economic environment, and so they're much more stable and much less sensitive to changes in economic conditions. And on the flip side, you've got some of those other types of businesses like metals and mining companies that are very leveraged to global growth and positive changes in those conditions. So they're the more cyclical ones that tend to be a bit more volatile.
Maybe just two other little anecdotes of examples of stocks that fit into that high volatility, high payoff, but not good long-term investment structure. Think about something like biotech. They're researching, trying to develop a new drug to do something wonderful for the world, which, if it's successful, will have huge applications and huge potential, but it's very hard to bring those to market and very hard to get success in that space. So there's a low probability of success, and a huge payoff if you get it right.
The other one would be an explorer. We have lots of small metals and mining companies in Australia. They stake their claim in the ground, and people are excited by that potential upside if they do find something. And it's a large payoff if they do, but also a very low probability, and there are lots of costs involved in getting to that endpoint. So it can be a very volatile journey for them.
Bruce Apted: Thanks, Ally. Great to be here.
Ally Selby: If you enjoyed that too, don't forget to subscribe to Livewire's YouTube channel. We're adding so much great content just like this every single week.Learn more
Bruce's fund invests in a diversified portfolio of approximately 50-100 Australian listed securities across a range of sectors. The strategy looks for high quality companies that are reasonably valued and have an improving growth outlook and positive investor sentiment
5 topics
1 fund mentioned
1 contributor mentioned