What creates the next great "market champion"?

Bridgewater Associates has written a paper on the exact subject. Now, a selection of the best fund managers give their take.
Hans Lee

Livewire Markets

One of the fundamental lessons of investing is that the cycle dominates almost everything. It's up to businesses, governments, central banks, and investors to ascertain what kind of cycle markets are in and how you would want to invest accordingly.

For instance, during the very end of the ultra-low inflation and near-zero interest credit era, it made sense for a business like Afterpay to flourish, and for investors to gravitate towards it, or when geopolitical uncertainty grips markets, it makes sense for energy and gold companies to receive a lot of inflows. And, as I've heard a fundie or two say before, when everyone thinks it will never rain again, you buy agricultural stocks.

These are three examples of signs of businesses that are cyclical. They are good on their own, but given a specific tailwind behind them, they can become extraordinary flavour-of-the-month stories. But this story isn't about them. This story is about creating the kinds of businesses that can surge during one cycle and stay there. Bridgewater Associates, the respected hedge fund founded by Ray Dalio, calls these companies the "market champions". 

And in this first of a two-part wire series, we will discover what turns a market darling into a market champion.

It wasn't always like this...

Suppose you only started investing during the COVID-19 pandemic. In that case, you may think of two things: 1) Stocks are superior to bonds in every economic scenario and 2) Where in doubt, buy Nvidia and the Magnificent Seven.

But it wasn't always this way. This JPMorgan chart shows how the US stock market's leadership tends to gyrate between stocks that benefit from growth-oriented names and value-oriented names.

Source: JP Morgan
Source: JP Morgan
The US tends to change its leading sectors on average every 10 years, which is roughly the same amount of time between major bear markets.
"While the timeline of each cycle is highly uncertain, the vast majority have eventually succumbed to new entrants. Some have gone to zero; some are still relevant today but have underperformed the broader market," Bridgewater analysts led by co-CIO Bob Prince wrote. 

They provide the following changes as examples:

  • Railroad monopolies of the 1900s to the 1930s
  • Chemical conglomerates of the 1930s to the 1960s
  • Auto conglomerates of the 1920s to the 1960s (General Motors (NYSE: GM))
  • Oil/Energy companies of the 1900s through the present (Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM), Chevron (NYSE: CVX), etc.)
  • Telecoms from the 1930s to 2000s (AT&T (NYSE: T))

But in every case, each industry was dealt a slow but steady decline in its influence on the stock market.

Source: Bridgewater Associates
Source: Bridgewater Associates

Today's world

Currently, the tech sector dominates leadership in the US equity market. And it's not hard to see the reasons why:

"Those range from strong competitive moats (network effects, advantage on data acquisition, advanced technical capabilities), incredibly strong balance sheets to finance new ventures that tap into new pools of secular spending growth, and a somewhat unprecedented ability to acquire and internalise the capabilities of small innovative businesses before they have the time and resources to develop as challengers," Bridgewater wrote.

But even within this tech sector dominance, there have been leaders among other leaders. Over the last 20 years, software, internet, and semiconductor companies have had their periods in the spotlight.

And that's not counting individual stock leaders between sectors. As Bridgewater sees it: 
"In terms of pricing, we see meaningful divergences within the cohort of current champions—in some cases, valuations look consistent with these companies' strong prospects, and in other cases, more outperformance than is likely looks priced in," they said.
Finally, Bridgewater argues that if you want to avoid "the forces of creative destruction" (and regulation), which have brought down many a market champion, they argue owning an equally weighted portfolio is a superior long-term idea. 

But what about in Australia?

In Australia, the story is less colourful than America's. Our data guru, Market Index founder Matthew Gabriele, tells us there is no historical data to show stock market leadership from an Australian perspective.

But he also argued you'd be hard-pressed to find a time where the financials (CBA, ANZ, Westpac, NAB) and at least one mining stock (namely BHP) have not been the lynchpins of the All Ordinaries since it launched in December 1979 - or the ASX 200 since it launched in April 2000.

Following the 2009 iron ore boom, Rio Tinto and Fortescue Metals joined the list. CSL also came to the fore. Together, these Big 8 stocks account for around $1 trillion in market capitalisation, and their dominance never flinches. 

Why is that? 

Justin Teo (Fidelity International), Emanuel Datt (Datt Capital), Luke Laretive (Seneca Financial Solutions)
Justin Teo (Fidelity International), Emanuel Datt (Datt Capital), Luke Laretive (Seneca Financial Solutions)
Emanuel Datt, CIO and Founder at Datt Capital says a lot of it concerns how "protectionist" minded we are. He points to the banks in this example:

"Australia has historically possessed a strong protectionist mindset, and this has been reflected in our economic policies. For instance, the '4 pillars' federal policy that applies to the four major banks was put in place ostensibly to maintain a competitive financial services sector," Datt said.

"However, the unintended consequences of this policy have been to entrench an oligopolistic industry structure in which it's almost impossible to displace any of the incumbents."

Justin Teo, Analyst and Portfolio Manager at Fidelity International, expresses a similar view:

"Australia is blessed with a large natural resource endowment which, combined with a relatively stable political environment, has allowed the country to build decades of expertise in mining," Teo said.

"The banking sector is very concentrated in Australia, as it’s an industry where scale matters. Macquarie is successfully disrupting the mortgage market in Australia, however, this is only possible because it has large businesses outside of mortgages to fund this disruption," he added.

Luke Laretive, CEO and Investment Adviser at Seneca Financial Solutions takes a different tack.

"Our market is dominated by companies that have been gifted oligopolistic control or a significant competitive advantage. 15 of the top 20 are a protected species," Laretive said.

"20% of the index are the Big Four banks operating in a regulated oligopoly. It's unlikely this dynamic will be materially disrupted while APRA requires more capital from anyone else who wants to write a loan. Then, there are a couple of ex-government entities in CSL and Telstra. The miners - BHP, Rio Tinto, Fortescue, Woodside, and Santos - leverage the natural competitive advantage under our feet and on our ocean floors. Throw in the supermarkets and a toll road, which are all regulator-supported."

The other five are what Laretive calls the genuine names - businesses that legitimately innovated, won market share and generated better shareholder returns on their way to the top. 

But whatever the reason, it's likely the dominant players in the market won't change anytime soon. And even if they stay the same, there are still great ideas underneath the surface. After all, given that Commonwealth Bank is the most expensive bank in the world (according to the MSCI World Bank Index), it's not exactly destined to become a 10-bagger.

That's where part two of this series comes in. Datt, Teo, and Laretive will join us in our next wire to share the traits they look for in a future market champion - and to name one they are looking at themselves.

........
Livewire gives readers access to information and educational content provided by financial services professionals and companies (“Livewire Contributors”). Livewire does not operate under an Australian financial services licence and relies on the exemption available under section 911A(2)(eb) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of any advice given. Any advice on this site is general in nature and does not take into consideration your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making a decision please consider these and any relevant Product Disclosure Statement. Livewire has commercial relationships with some Livewire Contributors.

3 contributors mentioned

Hans Lee
Senior Editor
Livewire Markets

Hans is one of Livewire's senior editors, specialising in global markets and economics. He is the creator and presenter of Livewire's "Signal or Noise".

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment