TOL - 16th May, 2024
What the Federal Budget means for the RBA and your investments
Structural budget deficits remain in the medium term as the revenue windfall fades and spending remains high.
The Budget is aimed at trying to lower inflation in the near term but supporting Government priorities including formally launching a “Future Made in Australia” (FMIA) over the medium term. In terms of the former, there is another round of cost-of-living subsidies designed to reduce measured inflation. In terms of the latter, it further cements bigger government and sees bigger deficits for the medium term.
Key budget measures
Key measures, many of which were announced prior, include:
- $5.4 billion in a broader round of cost-of-living relief, including broadening energy bill relief for all households and extending rent assistance.
- A renewed focus on the benefits to all households from the Stage 3 tax cuts that were rejigged in January (worth an average of $36/wk).
- $3 billion for community pharmacies for cheaper medication and $6.2 billion on Medicare and expanding the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
- $9.6 billion on housing and crisis accommodation and extra on related infrastructure (although much is a continuation of existing programs) and $89 million to train home builders (although the planned 20,000 new tradies are only 1.7% of the existing construction workforce).
- Prac payments for nurses, midwives and social workers.
- A change to student debt indexation which cuts the value of debt with no near-term budget cost as it won’t involve a handout to students.
- A mix of subsidies, tax breaks, cheap loans, relaxed foreign investment rules & less red tape to boost investment in government-chosen industries as part of the $22.7 billion “FMIA” policy.
- Caps on international student arrivals by each university which can be raised if they build more student accommodation.
- Extra spending on aged care & childcare to cover wage rises.
- Freeze on deeming rates for low-income households.
Budget savings include:
- Further savings in areas like consultants, compliance and efficiencies and reducing spending on the National Disability Insurance Scheme.
Economic assumptions
The Government left its growth forecasts unchanged for this year but revised them down slightly for the next two years. Notably, it has revised down slightly its inflation forecasts and still sees wage growth slowing from here as does the RBA, but an obvious risk to this is that its support for wage increases in certain industries has a flow-on effect on other industries
(just as the aged care wage rises last year seems to be leading to higher wages for childcare workers). It also sees lower inflation this year and next than the RBA and this is partly due to a continuation of cost-of-living relief measures that it sees as lowering measured inflation (by 0.5% in 2024-25), whereas the RBA assumed the measures lapse.
The Government now sees net immigration of 395,000 this financial year (MYEFO was 375,000), falling to 260,000 in 2024-25, taking population growth down to around 1.4% from 2.4% in 2022-23. The Government kept its medium-term iron ore price assumption at $US60/tonne. With the iron ore price well above that (>$US100 as of May 2024), it’s still a potential source of revenue upside.
Another budget surplus then bigger deficits
This Budget like all of those since 2020 has again benefitted from extra revenue flows coming from higher personal tax collections due to stronger job growth and higher commodity prices (and hence mining profits) than assumed. This is not smart management but good luck flowing from conservative forecasts.
This windfall (see the line called “parameter changes” in the next table) is estimated to reduce the deficit in this financial year by $10.6 billion compared to last December’s update, with a total benefit over the five years shown of $12.6 billion. But this table – a more detailed version of which appears in the Budget papers and is nicknamed the “table of truth” – also shows how much of the windfall has been spent (see the line called “new stimulus”).
Last year, only 14% of the windfall through the forward years was spent but this budget nearly twice the windfall (i.e. $24.4 billion) is being spent. As a result, while the budget now looks better for this financial year (with another surplus – which could turn out to be even bigger), because of the extra spending in subsequent years it now looks worse from 2024-25.
Due to new spending and structural pressures from interest costs, the NDIS, defence, health and aged care spending as a share of GDP is expected to average 26.2% over the longer term, well above the pre-COVID average of 24.8%. Despite a blip down with tax cuts, revenue trends up reaching its 1986-87 record of 26.2% of GDP in 10 years. So bracket creep, not spending restraint is assumed to do the work in getting us back to a budget balance.
After a surplus this year, there are bigger deficits over the next few years. Gross public debt is projected to remain elevated at around 35% of GDP before falling next decade.
Winners and losers
Winners include low and middle-income households; pensioners; women; medicine users; aged & child care workers; low-income renters; students; apprentices; home builders; students; defence; critical mineral projects; and clean energy manufacturers.
Losers include consultants, universities, foreign students, backpackers and dodgy NDIS providers.
Assessment
The positives in the Budget include: another surplus; the cost of living measures will help ease pressure on the most vulnerable and some will lower measured inflation with a second round flow onto lower indexed price rises and inflation expectations; tax breaks & streamlined approvals should help boost medium-term business investment; & there is still scope
for revenue to surprise with commodity price assumptions.
However, the Budget has several significant weaknesses around:
- Inflation: The cost-of-living measures will help lower measured inflation. However, the new stimulus (shown in the “table of truth” above) risks boosting demand. Federal and state fiscal positions point to a sharp shift from fiscal contraction (which helps lower demand and inflation) to expansion over the year ahead (see the next chart). Government support for high wage increases for some sectors risks adding to wage growth given the flow on and influencing effects at a time when wage growth is already at its maximum level consistent with the inflation target. All of which risks making the RBA’s job harder.
- Structural deficits: The Budget has added to medium-term structural deficits. This leaves it vulnerable if the economy weakens and sees no money put aside for a rainy day over the forecast period.
- Bigger government: Spending as a share of GDP is seen settling well above that seen pre-pandemic thereby locking in a bigger government sector which risks further slowing medium-term productivity growth.
- FMIA: While “Made in Australia” is popular and there is talk of a “new growth” model, its reliance on protectionism and government picking winners has been tried and failed in the past with a long-term cost to productivity and living standards. Moving to net zero is one thing, but this doesn’t mean we need to make solar panels or quantum computing or that we have a comparative advantage in them. Just because other countries are deploying subsidies is no reason for Australia to do so. We should just take the subsidised products!
- Productivity: Beyond the hopes of FMIA, there is not a lot here to improve Australia’s medium-term productivity performance. This is the key to growth in living standards but needs urgent reform in terms of tax, competition, the non-market services sector, industrial relations, education and training and energy generation. Fortunately, the Government is moving on the last two at least.
- Housing: The latest housing measures are welcome, but are unlikely to be enough to hit the 1.2 million new homes over five years objective with the supply shortfall set to remain unless immigration plunges.
Implications for the RBA
The direct lowering in measured inflation from the cost of living measures will be welcomed by the RBA, but it will be wary of the rise in new stimulus. The net effect adds to the risk of higher for longer interest rates but is probably not enough to change our forecast for a rate cut later this year.
Implications for Australian assets
Cash and term deposits – cash and bank deposit returns have improved substantially with RBA rate hikes and the Budget won’t change this much.
Bonds – another surplus takes the pressure off bond yields, but this is offset by higher medium-term deficits... so there is not much in it.
Shares – the Budget is positive for spending and hence retail shares, but this may be offset by higher than otherwise rates. Some manufacturers may benefit from FMIA. Overall, it looks neutral for shares.
Property – The housing measures are unlikely to alter the home price outlook which is dominated by supply shortages & high rates. We see modest home price growth this year.
The $A – the Budget is unlikely to change the direction for the $A.
Never miss an update
Enjoy this wire? Hit the ‘like’ button to let us know.
Stay up to date with my current content by
following me below and you’ll be notified every time I post a wire
Shane joined AMP in 1984 and is Chief Economist and Head of Investment Strategy. Shane has extensive experience analysing economic and investment cycles and what current positioning means for the return potential for different asset classes.
........
Livewire gives readers access to information and educational content provided by financial services professionals and companies (“Livewire Contributors”). Livewire does not operate under an Australian financial services licence and relies on the exemption available under section 911A(2)(eb) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of any advice given. Any advice on this site is general in nature and does not take into consideration your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making a decision please consider these and any relevant Product Disclosure Statement. Livewire has commercial relationships with some Livewire Contributors.
Shane joined AMP in 1984 and is Chief Economist and Head of Investment Strategy. Shane has extensive experience analysing economic and investment cycles and what current positioning means for the return potential for different asset classes.
Expertise
Shane joined AMP in 1984 and is Chief Economist and Head of Investment Strategy. Shane has extensive experience analysing economic and investment cycles and what current positioning means for the return potential for different asset classes.
Expertise
Comments
Comments
Sign In or Join Free to comment
most popular
Equities
Why "buy and manage" is the better way to invest in stocks
Livewire Markets
