Why didn’t housing arrears increase in the pandemic?

The onset of the pandemic led to a presumption that housing arrears would increase significantly. So why did they end up declining?

Is the lesson we take away that housing arrears won’t increase even in a recession?

Figure 1
Figure 1

Two factors stand out in driving declining arrears: the widespread provision of repayment holidays and the substantial fiscal support which specifically boosted the incomes of households.

  • Repayment holidays enabled borrowers to suspend their mortgage payments (principal and interest)without penalty for around 3 months if their loan was not already in arrears. While around 15% of borrowerstook out repayment holidays, for many this was precautionary and they subsequently made voluntarymortgage payments. In fact, there isn’t much of a relationship by the regions that experienced a largereconomic shock (as shown by a larger take-up of JobKeeper) and those with more repayment holidays (Figure 2). Not surprisingly more self-employed and investor borrowers took out repayment holidays.
  • Two major parts of the fiscal stimulus benefited the types of households with mortgages.
  1. JobKeeper ($88 billion, 6.6% of household disposable income) substituted for the wages of thosewhose work was impacted by the pandemic, income with which they could make mortgagepayments. Indeed, over half of households reported using JobKeeper payments to pay theirmortgage or rent. There isn’t much of a relationship between the regions that experienced a largereconomic shock (and so had larger JobKeeper take-up) and those with a larger increase in arrearsafter the pandemic, presumably because the stimulus helped to cushion the economic blow (Figure 3).
  2. Allowing lump-sum withdrawals from private superannuation ($38 billion, 2.8% of householddisposable income) of up to $20,000 also likely contributed as households with a mortgage tend tobe old enough to have built up at least some super. We don’t have precise data to link superwithdrawals to mortgage payments, but just under half of payments went to people aged 36-55, thecohort that owes most mortgage debt, so the circumstantial evidence is strong.
Figure 2
Figure 2


Figure 3
Figure 3

One interesting element is that it was mostly at the borrower’s discretion to take out a repayment holiday, and most did so early in the pandemic before they knew for sure the financial cost it would impose on them. In some ways, taking a repayment holiday may highlight those borrowers who were most concerned about their own financial position. There’s some evidence for this in that loans that took a repayment holiday had higher arrears both before and after the pandemic (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Figure 4

But we should not assume arrears will never increase. The pandemic was special, in that a health crisis was seen as a terrible and random event and so there was strong willingness by governments and lenders to help anyone suffering financially, and vaccines allowed a rapid economic recovery. So, we should not assume housing arrears will never increase. For further details, see the full version of this paper.

........
Disclaimer: The information in this article is current when sent. The author's views are their own and do not represent the views of any company within the Challenger group. These views do not take into account anyone's objectives, financial situation or needs. It is important to consider these matters before making any investment decision. It is general information only and is intended solely for licensed financial advisers or authorised representatives of licensed financial advisers and is provided to them on a confidential basis. Any examples shown in the article are for illustrative purposes only and are not a prediction or guarantee of any particular outcome. This article may include statements of opinion, forward looking statements, forecasts or predictions based on current expectations about future events and results. Actual results may be materially different from those shown. This is because outcomes reflect the assumptions made and may be affected by known or unknown risks and uncertainties that are not able to be presently identified. To the maximum extent permissible under law, neither Challenger nor its related entities, nor any of their directors, employees or agents, accept any liability for any loss or damage in connection with the use of or reliance on all or part of, or any omission inadequacy or inaccuracy in, the information in this article.

Jonathan Kearns
Chief Economist
Challenger

Jonathan Kearns is Chief Economist and Head of Regulatory Affairs at Challenger, where he also sits on the investment committee. He worked for 28 years at the Reserve Bank of Australia, occupying a wide range of senior roles, including Department...

Expertise

No areas of expertise

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment